Tuesday 9 December 1749

Plays

Event Type
Standard
Revenue
£123 10s 6d
Available Revenue
52%
Capacity
65%

Beneficiary(ies)
N/A
Commanded by
N/A
Requested by
N/A

Business

Income

Category Amount Full price Half price Aftermoney Supplementary Notes
Door Receipts £123 10s 6d £123 10s 6d £0 £0 £0
Total £123 10s 6d

Expenditure

Category Amount Payment Type A/c book entry Notes
Cleaners £3 17s Internal Charwomen Do [6 days]
Dancers 10s Internal Lucas Do. [a week's Sallary]
Doorkeepers and Officekeepers 8s Internal Tubman Do [6 days]
Doorkeepers and Officekeepers 9s Internal Jones Do [6 days]
Doorkeepers and Officekeepers 12s Internal Constable Do [6 days]
Doorkeepers and Officekeepers 10s Internal Wilford Do [6 days]
Doorkeepers and Officekeepers 10s Internal Ross Do. [6 days]
Doorkeepers and Officekeepers 10s Internal Barr Do [6 days]
Doorkeepers and Officekeepers 10s Internal Evans S Do [6 days]
Employees (Other) 12s Internal Osborne Do. [6 days] Perhaps the dancer of that name, described in BD vol. 11, p. 120. This Osborne was not included in the season's performers' payroll, but it appears that inclusion there may have been partly or wholly determined by salary level, rather than by the performer/non-performer distinction as such.
House Servants (Other) 10s Internal Browse Do. [6 days] Browse was not included in the season's performers' payroll, but it appears that inclusion there may have been partly or wholly determined by salary level, rather than by the performer/non-performer distinction as such. Thus Browse was probably, but not certainly, a house servant.
House Servants (Other) 9s Internal Rabbitt Do [6 days] Rabbitt was not included in the season's performers' payroll, but it appears that inclusion there may have been partly or wholly determined by salary level, rather than by the performer/non-performer distinction as such. Thus Rabbitt was probably, but not certainly, a house servant.
House Servants (Other) 10s Internal Bayley Do [6 days] Bayley was not included in the season's performers' payroll, but it appears that inclusion there may have been partly or wholly determined by salary level, rather than by the performer/non-performer distinction as such. Thus Bayley was probably, but not certainly, a house servant.
House Servants (Other) 10s Internal Smith Do. [6 days] Smith was not included in the season's performers' payroll, but it appears that inclusion there may have been partly or wholly determined by salary level, rather than by the performer/non-performer distinction as such. Thus Smith was probably, but not certainly, a house servant.
House Servants (Other) 12s Internal Driscol Do [6 days]
House Servants (Other) 12s Internal Jarvis Do. [6 days] BD vol. 8, p. 139 suggests Jarvis was a housekeeper and pit officekeeper, and this may have been his salary in only one of those capacities.
House Servants (Other) £1 10s Internal Mr. Perry 6 days Perry was not included in the season's performers' payroll, but it appears that inclusion there may have been partly or wholly determined by salary level, rather than by the performer/non-performer distinction as such. Thus Perry was probably, but not certainly, a house servant.
Housekeeping £1 Internal Page a week's Sallary Mr Page, identified as a housekeeper in the 1740-41 account book.
Performers (Other) £155 7s Internal [performers' payroll entries here aggregated] This payroll seems to have included a few people who were not performers, but most of them were. Moreover, the payment record of 10 May 1750 shows that it was conceived as the performers' list; and even the non-performers were perhaps more related to performance than most house servants were, such as John Stede the prompter.
Treasurers £1 Internal White Do [6 days]
Dressers £4 3s Internal Women Dressers Do [6 days]
Tailoring £4 18s 10d Departmental Meares Taylor in full
Miscellaneous £56 14s 2d Departmental By the Nightly Charge
Total £236 4s