| Cleaners |
£1 18s 6d |
Internal |
Charwomen Do. [3 Days] |
|
| Dancers |
£20 |
Departmental |
Mr Lalauze on acct. |
Charles Lalauze seems to have been considered CG dancing master at this time, and to have introduced pupils of his to the stage, such that payments to him "on acct." may have constituted more than just his own salary. |
| Dancers |
10s |
Internal |
Lucas a weeks Sallary |
|
| Doorkeepers and Officekeepers |
4s |
Internal |
Tubman Do [3 Days] |
|
| Doorkeepers and Officekeepers |
6s |
Internal |
Cundell Do [3 Days] |
|
| Employees (Other) |
6s |
Internal |
Osborne Do [3 Days] |
Perhaps the dancer of that name, described in BD vol. 11, p. 120. This Osborne was not included in the season's performers' payroll, but it appears that inclusion there may have been partly or wholly determined by salary level, rather than by the performer/non-performer distinction as such. |
| House Servants (Other) |
15s |
Internal |
Perry Do [3 Days] |
Perry was not included in the season's performers' payroll, but it appears that inclusion there may have been partly or wholly determined by salary level, rather than by the performer/non-performer distinction as such. Thus Perry was probably, but not certainly, a house servant. |
| House Servants (Other) |
6s |
Internal |
Jarvis Do [3 Days] |
BD vol. 8, p. 139 suggests Jarvis was a housekeeper and pit officekeeper, and this may have been his salary in only one of those capacities. |
| House Servants (Other) |
4s 6d |
Internal |
Rabbitt Do [3 Days] |
Rabbitt was not included in the season's performers' payroll, but it appears that inclusion there may have been partly or wholly determined by salary level, rather than by the performer/non-performer distinction as such. Thus Rabbitt was probably, but not certainly, a house servant. |
| Performers (Other) |
£52 4s 6d |
Internal |
[performers' payroll entries here aggregated] |
This payroll seems to have included a few people who were not performers, but most of them were. Moreover, the payment record of 10 May 1750 (in the 1749-50 account book, which followed the same format as 1746-1747) shows that it was conceived as the performers' list; and even the non-performers were perhaps more related to performance than most house servants were, such as John Stede the prompter. |
| Security |
6s |
Internal |
Potter Do. [3 Days] |
|
| Treasurers |
10s |
Internal |
White Do. [3 Days] |
|
| Treasurers |
£1 |
Internal |
Mr Pritchard 3 Days |
|
| Dressers |
£2 11s |
Internal |
Women Dressers Do [3 Days] |
|
| Tailoring |
12s |
Internal |
Hamersly Do [3 Days] |
|
| Scene Painters |
£10 10s |
Internal |
Mr Servandoni |
|
| Upkeep and Refurbishments (Other) |
£9 5s |
Departmental |
Mr. Price (Smith) a Bill for work done at L. F. Theatre |
BD vol. 12, p. 155 does not give much information on Mr Price. But expense records 1746-47 suggest that he oversaw carpentry, painting, and general building work that season, partly or exclusively at Lincoln's Inn Fields. As such, these payments probably did not relate to scenes or machines, hence their categorisation here. |
| Printing |
£52 12s |
External |
Mr. Woodfall Printer in part of his Bill for last Season |
|
| Management |
£15 15s |
Internal |
Mr. Rich |
|
| Proprietorial (Other) |
£10 10s |
External |
Mr. J Rich on acct. |
|
| Miscellaneous |
£93 19s 6d |
Departmental |
[nightly charge] |
This season's account book does not record or itemise the nightly charges, but it is evident that they were diverted from the nightly receipts. The sums are here calculated by deducting the money received into the treasury from this night's performance receipts or benefit charge, as appropriate. This night's entire door receipts, £93 19s 6d, seem to have been diverted, but for what purpose is unclear. Presumably some, about £20, went to pay the nightly charge; an expense of the same date reads, "Advanc'd to pay the Nightly Charge", £15 6d, whereas the nightly charge was normally worth c.£34-37. Perhaps the rest was used to cover outstanding nightly charge liabilities from previous nights. |
| Miscellaneous |
£15 6d |
Departmental |
Advanc'd to pay the Nightly Charge |
The door receipts of this night did not suffice to pay the nightly charge, the settlement of which was not recorded in this season's surviving account book. |
| Total |
£289 5s 6d |