Category,Amount,"Payment Type","A/c book entry",Notes
Cleaners,"£3 15s 0d",Internal,"By Mr Sarjant for Charwomen","Payment date appears to be 15 September 1759, but may be 15 October, as the preceding batch of entries appears to be dated to 22 September (but may in fact be 12 September). ""+"" symbols have been written in superscript before the apparent ""22"" and the ""15""."
"Carpentry and Sceneshifting","£5 13s 6d",Departmental,"By Mr Gom for Scene Men [per] bill","Payment date appears to be 15 September 1759, but may be 15 October, as the preceding batch of entries appears to be dated to 22 September (but may in fact be 12 September). ""+"" symbols have been written in superscript before the apparent ""22"" and the ""15""."
"Scene Painters","£1 10s 0d",Internal,"By Mr. Dall on Accot. of Salary","Payment date appears to be 15 September 1759, but may be 15 October, as the preceding batch of entries appears to be dated to 22 September (but may in fact be 12 September). ""+"" symbols have been written in superscript before the apparent ""22"" and the ""15""."
"Scene Painters"," 12s 0d",Internal,"By Mr. Austin 6 days Salary","Payment date appears to be 15 September 1759, but may be 15 October, as the preceding batch of entries appears to be dated to 22 September (but may in fact be 12 September). ""+"" symbols have been written in superscript before the apparent ""22"" and the ""15""."
Uncategorised," 12s 3d",Unknown,"By Do. [Mr. Austin] [per] bill","Payment date appears to be 15 September 1759, but may be 15 October, as the preceding batch of entries appears to be dated to 22 September (but may in fact be 12 September). ""+"" symbols have been written in superscript before the apparent ""22"" and the ""15"". Austin was paid a weekly bill, probably for painting room supplies. However, only the record of 12 November 1757 specifies a ""bill for Colours"", and Austin began to be paid for candle-snuffing duties from the 1759-60 season onwards, so most of his bill payments cannot be confidently categorised."